{
  "auditor_id": "blocking-B-semantic",
  "run_id": "run-002",
  "revision": "v4",
  "terminal": true,
  "stale": false,
  "full_read": true,
  "audit_scope": [
    "exact frozen candidate full-read",
    "authority semantic consistency",
    "continuity and reveal integrity",
    "character agency and causal logic",
    "adversarial originality architecture review",
    "ending consequence and thematic integrity",
    "frozen provenance and audit-set verification",
    "frozen originality receipt and 17-project comparison matrix review"
  ],
  "candidate_sha256": "b4f8136eb6ac3ef29c2c6036ad0fc73726e8317ce0f8205a1c4bf1cb83da230d",
  "audit_set_sha256": "a537f38eb1ea8287c6c21259000deb9139388d96e80e9544bd6fc621c81c2968",
  "audit_lock_receipt_sha256": "bc561f65a2c368c2c11c9a6b470d1ca90f98a562765074ca1d01dbdab0260b36",
  "observed_hashes": {
    "work/story/run-002/candidate-v4.txt": "b4f8136eb6ac3ef29c2c6036ad0fc73726e8317ce0f8205a1c4bf1cb83da230d",
    "work/story/run-002/authority/outline.json": "b36a31c9d7ea0271e6a7aaa39ff110c2a7674aaec85b3f0beef58d634b1119d0",
    "work/story/run-002/authority/story-brief.json": "4a211006bf564f359740fe188d01a3792bfd277de2145fce9bb9460617c70ffd",
    "work/story/run-002/authority/characters.json": "577227ba53ee086ff07b3485a41ff57e7820dde86f9c04840a645b14a67db080",
    "work/story/run-002/authority/ledger.json": "66c4a66d1d31ea90444b29609a9236701c3cdaed5e2b86613306b88d5e7e742a",
    "work/story/run-002/authority/identity-registry.json": "da4101aad4992f3a394677f0f117af60a03b338bbaf3a436ba267e5f3f4a768d",
    "work/story/run-002/authority/reveal-ledger.json": "75f08fc8b7d9bba6d23c628a5f7f517407ae38f9410dbd59b4173f3faa301d2d",
    "log/run-002/candidate-validation-v4.json": "fb818ac218fce0c8687166b9c7cdb993c01a50837f159c1ac3ec611d16e2e0db",
    "log/run-002/originality-v4.json": "8241dd96b563229442ccc1f595c3a44a9452f0e68564f553368bff5a9bc897e8"
  },
  "snapshot_verification": {
    "locked_file_count": 9,
    "all_locked_rows_exact": true,
    "audit_set_digest_reproduced": true
  },
  "semantic_verdict": "PASS",
  "originality_verdict": "PASS",
  "agency_verdict": "PASS",
  "ending_verdict": "PASS",
  "provenance_verdict": "PASS",
  "blocker_count": 0,
  "high_count": 0,
  "findings": [],
  "adversarial_notes": [
    "The causal chain remains coherent: Dao Quỳnh's unauthorized guarantee causes the fund loss and housing deadline, while her later promise of Hoài Túc's labor repeats the same agency violation in a distinct and escalating form.",
    "The climax preserves bilateral agency because Dao Quỳnh rejects conditional family money and Hoài Túc returns the conditional apartment key without knowing the other's decision.",
    "Supporting characters retain meaningful agency and consequences: Chí Duy closes the stall and accepts employment, Quang Nghiêm accepts transport, and both families absorb inconvenience rather than becoming passive instruments.",
    "The ending preserves the debt, lost bonus, longer commutes, family disappointment, and inadequate housing; care resumes without functioning as forgiveness, restitution, or proof that the breach no longer matters.",
    "The final washer, shoes, keys, and red thermos remain domestic relational motifs rather than evidence devices, public-validation mechanisms, permission formulas, or substitute climax actions.",
    "Reveal provenance is intact: the guarantee, conditional apartment, conditional debt rescue, returned key, and private climax choices enter the narrative through the authority-defined speakers, documents, actions, and knowledge order.",
    "The originality receipt binds the exact frozen candidate and records zero exact 12-token matches across 17 projects, a maximum exact run of seven tokens, and materially distinct causal architecture for every comparison.",
    "Some late thematic narration states the story's principle explicitly, but the ending earns it through persistent costs and concrete voluntary actions, so it does not rise to blocking or high severity."
  ],
  "promotion_eligible": true,
  "verdict": "PASS"
}