{
  "audit_type": "fresh_release_audit_trimmed_batch_p1_p4",
  "generated_at": "2026-07-16",
  "project_id": "gacmai_20260716_010735",
  "verdict": "pass",
  "release_gate": "PASS",
  "summary_vi": "Đã đọc đủ 48 đoạn của đúng bản budget-trim P1-P4, không dùng report pre-trim làm bằng chứng nội dung. Bản trim giữ đúng mạch start/end, setup và giới hạn claim: E01/E02 được dựng ở P1, E03 ở P2, E04/E06/E09 ở P3, E01 chỉ payoff một phần và E05 setup ở P4. Không có payoff sớm, không có nhân vật thứ bảy có tên, không có bare surname/role surname, không stale domain/meta, không đổi POV. Prose nghe được, giàu tín hiệu âm thanh và giữ các giới hạn kỹ thuật/pháp lý. Không phát hiện finding chặn release.",
  "scope": {
    "trimmed_batch_path": "/home/hermes/gacmai_20260716_010735_batch_1_4_budget_rev1.json",
    "locked_outline_path": "/home/hermes/gacmai_20260716_010735_locked_outline.json",
    "prior_immutable_source_path": "/home/hermes/gacmai_20260716_010735_batch_1_4_locked_f9117297ad56.json",
    "paragraphs_read": 48,
    "parts_read": [1, 2, 3, 4],
    "audit_basis": "Trimmed narration bytes and locked outline only; pre-trim audit/report used as provenance context, not as content evidence."
  },
  "checksums": {
    "trimmed_expected_sha256": "e1804ae56f7df37b46dd506e578e68ddc972dfa2d2ad8788791a9469e9e7549e",
    "trimmed_before_sha256": "e1804ae56f7df37b46dd506e578e68ddc972dfa2d2ad8788791a9469e9e7549e",
    "trimmed_after_sha256": "e1804ae56f7df37b46dd506e578e68ddc972dfa2d2ad8788791a9469e9e7549e",
    "locked_outline_expected_sha256": "a854a58cf5e8a628c9875f041660773202eba6d390ce93e53e0016984901dbe0",
    "locked_outline_before_sha256": "a854a58cf5e8a628c9875f041660773202eba6d390ce93e53e0016984901dbe0",
    "locked_outline_after_sha256": "a854a58cf5e8a628c9875f041660773202eba6d390ce93e53e0016984901dbe0",
    "prior_immutable_source_expected_sha256": "f9117297ad568d7fe31ece2dd952b305aa17517b2959f97c351c6532c925b265",
    "prior_immutable_source_before_sha256": "f9117297ad568d7fe31ece2dd952b305aa17517b2959f97c351c6532c925b265",
    "prior_immutable_source_after_sha256": "f9117297ad568d7fe31ece2dd952b305aa17517b2959f97c351c6532c925b265",
    "source_modified": false
  },
  "structural_checks": {
    "part_order_and_range": "pass",
    "paragraph_counts": {"P1": 12, "P2": 12, "P3": 12, "P4": 12},
    "total_paragraphs": 48,
    "json_parse": "pass",
    "start_end_states": "pass",
    "finding": null
  },
  "content_criteria": [
    {
      "criterion": "continuity_and_start_end_states",
      "status": "pass",
      "evidence": "P1.1-P1.12 move from controlled restoration and trust to first suspicion while An Nhiên still believes Khải Minh will repair the issue. P2.1-P2.12 move from internal correction opportunity to altered registration structure and loss of physical control over the archive. P3.1-P3.12 move from retained access to revoked access, large export, and exclusion from the data store. P4.1-P4.12 move from suspicion of export to public commercial use of the mother's voice, refusal to stop the campaign, and the seeded incorrect platform-number draft."
    },
    {
      "criterion": "evidence_setup_and_claim_limits",
      "status": "pass",
      "evidence": "E01 watermark and E02 consent matrix are concretely created and bounded in P1. E03 contract/registration divergence is set up in P2 without naming the editor, time, motive, forgery, or criminal liability. E04 network/service-account export limits and E06 playlist-versus-playback-recorder architecture are set up in P3; E09 backup playback box, serial number, seal, and physical custody are introduced without treating it as proof of operator identity. P4.2-P4.3 gives E01 only a narrow partial payoff: origin from An Nhiên's master, while preserving the need for independent testing and not identifying copier or illegality. E05 is setup only in P4.9-P4.11; the incorrect draft is linked to An Nhiên's correction and preservation of the email, not to who loaded or broadcast it."
    },
    {
      "criterion": "no_premature_payoff",
      "status": "pass",
      "evidence": "P1-P3 explicitly retain uncertainty. P4.2-P4.4 narrow the E01/E02 inference rather than closing the case. E04/E06/E09 remain architecture and custody setup; E05 remains an unbroadcast draft with unknown downstream handling. No decisive operator, motive, or authority outcome appears before the locked outline's later payoff parts."
    },
    {
      "criterion": "authority_and_claim_scope",
      "status": "pass",
      "evidence": "The narration does not assign criminal, civil, employment, or safety findings to an authority that has not acted. P4.4 frames the request as asking the exploiter to produce another basis, not as a legal verdict. P4.6-P4.7 presents the dispute and refusal without pretending An Nhiên can order the campaign stopped. P3.2-P3.3 and P3.9-P3.12 preserve the distinction between account/device evidence and the identity of the operator."
    },
    {
      "criterion": "point_of_view",
      "status": "pass",
      "evidence": "All 48 paragraphs remain third-person limited around Lê An Nhiên. Khải Minh, Mỹ Dung, Thu Hà, and Gia Bảo are observed through her access and interpretation; no antagonist interiority or omniscient disclosure appears."
    },
    {
      "criterion": "named_character_limit_and_naming",
      "status": "pass",
      "evidence": "Only the six outline-bible characters are named: Lê An Nhiên, Trần Khải Minh, Phạm Mỹ Dung, Vũ Hoàng Lâm, Nguyễn Thu Hà, and Đỗ Gia Bảo. No named seventh character appears. No prohibited bare surname or role-plus-surname form appears; references use full names, allowed short names, pronouns, or role descriptions."
    },
    {
      "criterion": "stale_domain_and_meta",
      "status": "pass",
      "evidence": "The trim stays in the locked domain of voice restoration, consent matrices, accessibility guidance, Đông Môn station, playback infrastructure, and contractor governance. No stale domain, prior-project terminology, authoring meta, audit/report language, or release narration appears in story prose."
    },
    {
      "criterion": "editorial_audio_prose",
      "status": "pass",
      "evidence": "The prose is narratable and audio-first: room silence, hiss, breath, tongue contact, phase inversion, high-frequency filtering, relay/playback layers, pauses, station ambience, and the recurring three-note watermark are expressed as heard events. Sentences retain clear causal subjects and avoid technical claims that require silent visual explanation."
    },
    {
      "criterion": "opening_and_closing_hooks",
      "status": "pass",
      "evidence": "P1 opens with silence and a tactile restoration action, then plants the three-note signature and consent matrix before the social breach. P4 closes on the irreversible emotional and rights violation while preserving unresolved identity, legal basis, and technical custody questions, creating the correct handoff into P5 rather than a false resolution."
    }
  ],
  "paragraph_findings": [],
  "minor_editorial_notes": [
    "P4.2 uses 'đủ để ... nhận ra' but P4.3 immediately narrows that recognition to source-origin and preserves independent verification; treated as intentional partial payoff, not a claim-limit defect.",
    "P3.7's 'bản in lệnh thay đổi quyền' is appropriately framed as something An Nhiên glimpses, while the paragraph avoids treating the date as proof of who authored the command."
  ],
  "release_statement": "PASS: release the trimmed P1-P4 candidate against the recorded SHA. No source file was modified by this audit."
}